Leadership Identity: Who You Are, What They See

Read on Medium

When you bring all of who you are into leadership, you expand judgment, range, and resilience. That’s data, not opinion.

Every leader carries two stories. The first is the one you tell yourself about who you are. The second is what others say about you when you leave the room. Great strategies can sit untouched, not because they lack merit, but because the leader behind them isn't recognized as the kind of voice the culture is ready to follow.

Leader vs. Leadership Identity 

Researchers distinguish between leader identity (your internal sense of being a leader) and leadership identity (the group's recognition of your legitimacy). Identity develops as we interpret experiences and assign meaning, strengthening or shifting our leadership. 

Authority takes shape only through the ways identity is understood and endorsed in context. It’s the mechanism through which authority is understood, supported, and acted upon. 

Identity and Context 

Group membership—such as gender, race, or profession—shapes not only how we perceive leadership but also how others perceive it. Power and privilege influence whose decisions are considered legitimate. 

Put differently, leadership identity is co-constructed. You may see yourself as a strategist, innovator, or builder, but your influence only sticks when your culture recognizes that identity as credible. 

From the Field 

In one healthcare system, senior physicians defined leadership in terms of clinical authority and regulatory compliance. Rising leaders defined it as bridging the gap between patients, staff, and the community. The data supporting equity practices was strong; however, decisions stalled until the board chair reframed credible leadership as encompassing both clinical excellence and community partnership. The numbers hadn’t changed. The recognized leadership identity had. Similar identity shifts are evident in sectors like finance, where traditional risk-averse leadership is giving way to innovation-driven strategies, and in technology, where companies prioritize collaborative environments over hierarchical models.

These transitions underscore the widespread shift in leadership identity across industries. 

Similar dynamics play out across sectors. In higher education, legacy leaders cling to the academic hierarchy, while student-centered leaders advocate for greater access. In corporate boardrooms, traditional “command-and-control” identities collide with relational and adaptive identities demanded by today’s workforce. Each case reveals the same truth: strategy moves only as far as leadership identity is endorsed. 

Whole-Person Leadership 

Identity also travels with us. Caregiver, strategist, innovator, first-gen professional, community builder — these roles don’t vanish when we step into leadership. They strengthen it. Integrating lived experience with leadership identity expands judgment, range, and resilience. 

Research indicates that leaders with transformational styles inspire a stronger commitment to the mission and culture. Teams with inclusive communication, often modeled by women, also demonstrate higher collective intelligence. The presence of women in leadership increases perceptions of fairness and trust. 

The point is bigger than gender. Leadership identity benefits from the full integration of identity and behavior. When you lead from all that you are, you create value for culture and decision-making that no technical skillset can substitute. 

Questions to Ask Yourself 

• How do I currently define my leadership identity in one sentence? 

• Who must recognize and endorse that identity for my influence to land? 

• What lived experiences am I leaving outside the room that could strengthen how I lead? 

• Where does my leadership identity collide with culture — and what would it take to align the two? 

Culture Shaping 

Leaders are not just identity holders; they are identity designers. Audit rituals of recognition: who speaks first, whose data counts, who closes decisions. Expand the criteria for 'credible leadership' beyond compliance or margin to include belonging, fairness, and impact. Recognition is not an accident — it is a choice leaders can redesign. As a concrete first step, observe a meeting with a focus on these patterns of recognition. Pay attention to whose voices are prioritized and how decisions are reached. This initial action will help emerging leaders begin the journey of culture shaping effectively. 

Key Takeaways:

1. Leadership identity is dynamic and co-created.

2. Aligning your self-view with how others perceive you accelerates decision-making.

3. Integrate your lived experience for greater legitimacy and impact.

4. Intentionally shape cultures that recognize diverse leadership so more voices are valued. As a practical step, write your leadership identity in one sentence and share it with a peer for immediate feedback and growth. 

Author Bio 

Ricka’ Berry, MBA, is a strategist, former executive, and founder of genius grace. As a doctoral candidate in leadership and systems design, she assists leaders in aligning their strategy with whole-person leadership, combining 20 years of practical experience with research on how organizations grow, adapt, and endure.